Anne Boleyn and Margaery Tyrell Take Aim at Love and a Throne



Natalie Dormer and Jack Gleeson take aim at love this weekend. On the right, Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn. Image on left by Helen Sloan © HBO.

Natalie Dormer is no stranger to playing the Queen. Having played the enigmatic Anne Boleyn in Showtime’s The Tudors, there were going to be some inevitable comparisons between Margaery Tyrell and Anne Boleyn. One is a fictional queen and one is amongst the most controversial queens in English history. Natalie is resolved to separate the two:

“You’ll appreciate that I’m trying very, very hard as an actor to separate my characterizations,” Natalie said in an interview last year. “It was a concern for me when I took on the role that I wanted to differentiate them as much as possible. So I aim to do that and I challenge myself to do that every single day. I want to create a completely independent character.”


Natalie Dormer as Queen Anne Boleyn © Showtime

Natalie fought very hard to improve the Anne Boleyn that The Tudors portrayed, going so far as to beg producer Michael Hirst to represent the real Anne Boleyn and her role in the beginnings of the English Reformation. After having to smirk and flounce her way through Season One, Natalie was able to give a performance in Season Two that has cemented her place as a favourite among Anne Boleyn admirers. Natalie’s casting as Margaery Tyrell in Game of Thrones was met with wide approval from fans. But are there any actual similarities between Margaery Tyrell and Anne Boleyn? We can draw parallels from historical events, but their personalities are night and day.

Anne Boleyn was fire and Margaery is ice

According to Natalie:

“They’re totally different women… In so far as it’s “A Song of Ice and Fire,” Anne Boleyn was fire and Margaery is ice. Margaery is a lot more practical, cool. She’s been trained for this sort of level of politics and machinations from an early age. She’s intellectual about it, whereas Anne Boleyn was very much a creature driven by passion and instinct and visceral qualities. So, in their roots, the characterizations come from two different places.”

Family Roots



Natalie Dormer and Diana Rigg. Image by Helen Sloan © HBO.

One of the fundamental disparities between Margaery and Anne is their upbringing. Margaery is of House Tyrell of Highgarden, one of the Great Houses of the Seven Kingdoms. House Tyrell is wealthy and powerful; its wealth is only surpassed among the Great Houses by House Lannister. Mace Tyrell may be the head of House Tyrell, but it is the matriarch Olenna Tyrell who wields the true power. Under her grandmother’s wing, Margaery learns just how much power the women of the family can wield. House Tyrell comes to dominate their alliance with the Lannisters, with Margaery in the place of utmost importance, the soon-to-be Queen of Westeros.


Disputed image
of Thomas Boleyn

The Boleyn men were wealthy merchants who made a habit of marrying above their station. One of the greatest marriages made was between Sir William Boleyn and Margaret Butler in 1475. It was her status and wealth that may have secured her son Thomas Boleyn a place at the Tudor court. Thomas’s rising career at court saw him soon married to his own heiress, Elizabeth Howard of the powerful House of Norfolk. In 1509 he was created a Knight of the Bath, and by 1513 he had managed to secure his younger daughter Anne a highly sought-after place in the household of Margaret of Austria.

Anne received an unusually good education for a woman and her intelligence was evident from an early age. Margaret of Austria wrote to Thomas Boleyn: I find her of such good address and so pleasing in her youthful age that I am more beholden to you for having sent her to me than you are to me.1 In 1514 young Anne was sent to France, along with her sister, as part of Mary Tudor’s entourage. It is likely Anne was chosen for her fluency in French. When it was time to come back to England, however, 15 year-old Queen Claude requested Anne stay in her household. Anne would go on to serve her for seven years.

Claude_de_France_by_Corneille_de_Lyon Mary_Boleyn-face
 Queen Claude Mary Boleyn

By the time Anne arrived back in England, her sister Mary was involved in an affair with King Henry VIII. One of the most popular myths that surrounds the Boleyn family is that Thomas used his daughters’ affairs with the king to advance his position at court and increase his wealth. Henry VIII was, in fact, not particularly generous to lovers. Historians often date the beginning of Mary and Henry’s affair to 1522 as this was when her husband William Carey began to receive some lucrative grants and offices. But Carey was an established favourite of the King. Thomas has been at court for more than two decades and was already a trusted member of Henry’s inner circle. Thomas never received any offices or grants he did not earn himself. Mary received nothing of significance. In fact, when Carey died, all of the lucrative grants from the king passed back to the crown. An impoverished Mary had to ask her sister to intercede with the king, who reluctantly granted Mary a pension.

By the time King Henry VIII noticed Anne, the Boleyns were a successful family of accomplished courtiers. But they were yet to be a truly powerful family.

“Stricken with the Dart of Love”


Are Margaery Tyrell and Joffrey taking aim at love? (Natalie Dormer and Jack Gleeson)  Image: Helen Sloan, © HBO

We see Margaery neatly step over the corpse of one husband and claim another. Joffrey seems as fond of Margaery as Joffrey can be fond of anything. As for Margaery, a King is a King. One will do as well as the other. But it is not a passionate affair that tore a kingdom apart.

The relationship between King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn was in fact a rather one-sided affair to begin with. When Anne Boleyn realised that Henry’s affections were a little more serious than courtly love, she flatly refused to become his mistress and retreated to her family home at Hever.


Anne and Henry shooting in the forest

The other great myth surrounding Anne Boleyn is that she manipulated Henry VIII by withholding sex. This rather simplistic misogynistic trick has been perpetuated by male and female writers alike over the centuries, creating an image of the scheming femme fatale who plotted and poisoned her way to the throne. One of the main reasons this argument, if you could call it that, has no credibility is that Anne had just had her hopes of marrying Henry Percy (Earl of Northumberland) dashed. If she was not good enough for a Percy — and the Percys were certainly very powerful — why would Anne think she had a chance at marrying a king? More likely, Anne did not want her chances at a good marriage ruined simply so a king could use and discard her, as her own sister had been.

It is likely Anne thought putting some distance between them would cool Henry’s fervour. It had the opposite effect. Henry was a real romantic — when he was not trying to get rid of his wives. He began to write his now-famous love letters to Anne and shower her with gifts. He went so far as to offer her the position of “official mistress”, which Anne again refused. She only succumbed when Henry decided he would make her his wife.

The affair between Anne Boleyn and Henry VIII outraged the nobility and the common people alike. Certainly you could argue there had been another “commoner” who had become a queen: Henry’s own grandmother, Elizabeth Woodville. And Edward IV married Elizabeth Woodville because she refused to become his mistress. Of course, the difference there was that Edward was a young bachelor, and Henry VIII had already been married for fifteen years.

 elizabeth-woodville-close  Young Edward IV Catherine_aragon_face-2
 Elizabeth Woodville Edward IV Katherine of Aragon

Elizabeth Woodville may never have been popular with the nobility, who saw her family as social upstarts, but the common people liked her well enough. She was an exemplary consort: a beautiful, pious and graceful queen who gave England a large brood of princes and princesses. Anne Boleyn, on the other hand, was breaking up the marriage of Henry VIII and the beloved Katherine of Aragon. Henry VIII began his dubious campaign, the “King’s Great Matter” to have his marriage to Katherine annulled. Katherine was not going to give in so easily. For seven years, the battle between them raged, and Henry VIII did the unthinkable. Unable to secure an annulment from the Pope, he broke from Rome. It would change English history and see centuries of religious upheaval. And all for the love of a woman.

From Courtier to Queen

Margaery: Calling yourself a king doesn’t make you one, and if Renly wasn’t a king, I wasn’t a queen.
Petyr Baelish: Do you want to be a queen?
Margaery: No. I want to be the queen.


Margaery’s first husband was her brother’s lover, Renly Baratheon (played by Gethin Anthony) Image by Helen Sloan, © HBO.

Margaery Tyrell is the perfect consort. When faced with Renley’s lack of arousal for her, Margaery cheerfully suggests her brother join them to get things going. When her husband is murdered, she moves smoothly on to the next. When confronted with Joffrey’s former betrothed at court, Sansa Stark, rather than treating her as a rival she befriends her and takes her under her wing. When Sansa tells her Joffrey is a monster, Margaery sighs and proceeds to ponder on how to manipulate Joffrey to keep him under control. Margaery is the ultimate politician, practical, cool and composed.

We cannot fault Anne’s performance as a queen consort, she was dedicated to religious reform, education and charity. She became pregnant immediately after her marriage to Henry VIII. While she suffered two miscarriages after her first birth, there is no reason to assume she may never have been able to conceive again. She may have secured her place had she given birth to the longed-for prince and may have eventually won the people over. But perhaps it was not in Anne’s nature to be Henry’s perfect wife.


It is difficult to ascertain what sort of queen Anne Boleyn would have become had she been given time. The contemporary accounts of Anne are fragmentary, although that is not to say what accounts we have of her give us a superficial picture. Some of the most valuable observations of Anne come from the pen of the Imperial ambassador Eustace Chapuys. While many assume he was her bitter enemy and gives us a biased account, this is not truly the case. Chapuys’ shrewd observations showed us the real Anne Boleyn, a fiercely intelligent and passionate woman, yet a woman under immense pressure who would let her temper get the better of her. And a woman who was naturally jealous when — after many years of a devoted and monogamous relationship — her husband took a mistress.


Anne Boleyn in the Tower of London – Edouard Cibot 1835

Anne admitted as much at her trial “I do not say I have always shown him that humility which his goodness to me merited. I confess I have had jealous fancies and suspicions of him, which I had not discretion enough, and wisdom, to conceal. But God knows, and is my witness, that I have not sinned against him in any other way2 .”

Chapuys had the measure of Henry VIII. He wrote to Charles V in July of 1536 “…the executioner’s sword and her own death were virtually to separate and divorce man and wife. But if such was their intention it strikes me that it would have been a far more decent and honest excuse to allege that she had been married to another man still alive…May God permit that this may be his last folly3 .”

Historians are still – and likely always will be – divided over the fall of Anne Boleyn. We may scrutinize Anne’s actions, her temper, her failure to provide Henry with an heir, but perhaps we should consider the least complex of matters. As Henry had threatened Anne when she complained of his taking a mistress “she ought to know that he could at any time lower her as much as he had raised her.” And so he did.

When you play a game of thrones you win or you die. Anne Boleyn paid with her life. Let’s hope fate is kinder to Margaery Tyrell.




By Olga Hughes. Olga runs the online magazine Nerdalicious with her partner C.S. Hughes. Nerdalicious is the best source of Game of Thrones and other pop culture news, including books, film, sci-fi and medieval history.


  1. Norton, Elizabeth The Anne Boleyn Papers, Amberley Publishing 2013 edition, p. 33 []
  2. Ives, Eric, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn, Blackwell Publishing, 2004 edition, pg 341 []
  3. Mackay, Lauren Inside the Tudor Court, Amberley Publishing 2014, pg 172 []
Olga Hughes

Olga runs the online magazine Nerdalicious with her partner C.S. Hughes. Nerdalicious is the best source of Game of Thrones and other pop culture news, including books, film, sci-fi and medieval history.


  • Reply April 12, 2014


    It has been some time (and the books are a bit of a slog) but I think there’s a bit of space between ASOIAF Margaery and GOT Margaery. In the books I believe Sansa was more of a political piece. Not terribly relevant to the discussion, but a good reminder of changes made to characters.

    And it’s easy to see how she could attract so much dislike in her own life, but I give her a bit more credit, or at least a bit less scorn. Considering the lengths he went to for her, he would have done something stupid sooner or later.

    • Reply April 12, 2014

      Jamie Adair

      Interesting comment. I’ll be interested to think what Olga thinks since she’s a writing a series on the books vs show at Nerdalicious right now.
      In your second paragraph, do you mean Henry? I think you must, right?

  • Reply April 12, 2014

    Olga Hughes

    I find GOT Margaery a little more interesting Grant, there are definite changes there. Jamie mentioned it in her last article too, the producers wanted to flesh her out more.
    George has yet to give us a Margaery POV chapter and I am not sure we will get one either. I agree Sansa is more of a pawn. But we can’t talk about much more yet, we’ve got a couple of seasons to go before the TV viewers are caught up.
    I have always thought the reformation halted with Anne’s death. She would have become a powerful and influential queen, or I like to think so.

  • Reply April 12, 2014


    No other “he” besides Henry to mention. And he was an excellent example of why monarchies aren’t such a good thing, the counterpoint to Frederick William.

    As for Sansa, we’ve already seen a difference in the show. In the show Margaery seems to stay by Sansa and remain friendly even after the engagement to Loras is broken off. I recall her being colder after the marriage to Willas was broken off in the books.

    • Reply April 15, 2014

      Olga Hughes

      Yes the Tyrells dropped Sansa as soon as the Lannisters figured out what they were up to, although Margaery did look at her ‘a sad look’ at her wedding to Tyrion. Olenna and Margaery’s cousins completely ignored her.
      I’ll be interested to see Margaery over the coming weeks, now that we’ve had the purple wedding.

  • Reply April 27, 2014


    I can see more of Catherine of Aragon on Margaery than Anne’s. Both were very clever, married their dead husband’s brother, both loved by the people, gracious yet regal. To me the fate of Anne, around the end of her life, can be more close to Margaery, but Margaery and Catherine have many things in common too, and don’t know why that was forgotten.

    • Jocelyn said: “I can see more of Catherine of Aragon on Margaery than Anne’s. Both were very clever, married their dead husband’s brother, both loved by the people, gracious yet regal. To me the fate of Anne, around the end of her life, can be more close to Margaery, but Margaery and Catherine have many things in common too, and don’t know why that was forgotten.”

      As usual Catherine of Aragon gets forgotten without a serious look taken into her, she was not always the “pious, old dotted” figure Hollywood and pop historians have portrayed. In fact looking at the young Catherine of Aragon we find more similarities between the Margery (especially BOOK Margery) and young Catherine of Aragon whose life was adventurous as (if not more) than Anne and the Tratasmara were also very conniving and ambitious. And as Jocelyn said both Catherine and Margaery were very ambitious and married two times (of course Margaery will be married a third time), their virginity always came into question not to mention Catherine’s mysterious relation with her Friar (which some have dismissed and may have been nothing serious but the man was known to have promiscuous reputation) and there were rumors surrounding that and questioning of her virginity with Arthur as Margaery’s reputation will later come in question in the coming season.
      Not to mention Margaery has to “win” Tommen by pandering to the little boy just as Catherine had to pander to little Henry.
      Instead of being outspoken like Anne, both Margaery and Catherine played the “sweet”, “gentle”, “dutiful” women that Joffrey tells his mother “intelligent women know what they are told” (series); they survived by playing the rules of the time.

  • Reply April 27, 2014

    Olga Hughes

    Well we are discussing the differences, rather than the similarities, between Margaery and Anne Boleyn in this particular article Jocelyn. But with that said I personally find very few parallels between Katherine and Margaery (who Jamie should be discussing at some point I believe, and I think she deserves her own articles)
    The two parallels you could draw is the consummation question of course – Katherine famously denying her marriage with Arthur was ever consummated and Margaery denying her marriage with Renly was consummated. However in Margaery’s case it is not a critical issue. Then that Margaery married her husband’s nephew and then brother, and Katherine her husband’s brother.
    But there are vast differences in that. Firstly the crown is in heavy debt to, and needs the Tyrells for financial and political support. The marriages are arranged quickly in one case and immediately in the other. Margaery is still valuable.
    After Isabella of Castille died and her title went to Juana, Katherine lost most of her political worth and was then held hostage for her unpaid dowry. Aragon was not a great inheritance, Isabella and Ferdinand had consistently lied to and then refused to pay the second half of her dowry. Katherine was then at the mercy of her father-in-law and her father’s good behaviour.
    When Henry VIII married Katherine he did it for “love”, he was fulfilling a romantic ideal. They also had a wonderful ten years of marriage before the fertility issue began to take its toll on them. The alliance with the Holy Roman Empire worked out well initially, under Charles, but later became a liability when Henry was seeking his annulment.

  • Reply April 20, 2015

    Jamie Adair

    Olga, reading this article over again – and enjoying it very much (thank you for contributing it) — I just realized something that I think is one of your points… (I’m sometimes a little slow on the uptake!) Anne was extraordinarily accomplished and that helped propel her into the stratosphere where she would meet a king. Unlike many people at court, she was not the child of the upper nobility.

    Anne’s talent, charm, and intelligence shone through from an early age. Margaret of Austria is *grateful* to Thomas Boleyn for having sent her his (“commoner”) daughter. Margaret of Austria writes that she is *beholden* to Thomas Boleyn — implying that she is so pleased by Anne that she owes *him* favors and patronage. I write commoner above because this wasn’t a mere pleasantry on Margaret’s part. Anne was so talented that rulers would look past her common background and sing her praises loudly.

    • Reply April 21, 2015

      Olga Hughes

      My pleasure Jamie. I agree it illustrates Anne’s accomplishments and charm, it also shows her parents were particularly concerned the children were well educated.
      But I would also point out it really demonstrates the great regard Margaret of Austria had for Thomas Boleyn, who was an accomplished courtier well before his daughters became favourites of the king. His reputation has suffered a great deal over the last decade or so.

  • Reply May 16, 2016

    Apocalyptic Queen

    This was a brilliant post. I am not convinced of the propaganda levelled at Anne Boleyn over the centuries. And I am livid when even supposedly independent, modern day women describe Anne as a devious schemer for daring to refuse Henry’s attentions when he wanted her to sleep with him. The fact that she challenged him in this way was almost unprecedented. She could actually have been putting herself and her family in danger by refusing his advances!

    As I have noted previously, I feel that elements of her character and story arc appear to be essentially, a fusion of Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn.

    For example, Like Catherine of Aragon, Margaery was betrothed to, and was married to the eldest male heir, and then went on to marry his younger brother when the eldest died.

    Like Catherine of Aragon, she is kind and gentle and like both queens, she shows a genuine concern for the welfare of the poor.

    However like Anne Boleyn, she is also fiercely intelligent, cunning, ambitious and perhaps slightly mannipulative.

    Like Anne Boleyn, Margaery is very close to her brother, whose close affinities led to dishonour (Anne was accused of incestual relations with her brother and Loras’ so-called immoral behaviour, equally lands Margaery in a whole lot of trouble in the TV show).

    Margaery is arrested on (false) and fabricated charges of adultery in the book (as historians now seem to think was the case with Anne Boleyn). In the book, there is also an accusation that she drank “moon tea” to procure a miscarriage (Anne was demonised as a witch by her enemies who made allusions to her failed pregnancies).

    Furthermore, as with Anne, the men with whom Margaery is arrested (in the book anyway) are demonised – possibly (as historians have theorised to be the case with Anne Boleyn) to make her crimes seem so heinous that only an unfavourable verdict such as death, can possibly be pronounced.

    Perhaps, these similarties may foreshadow Margaery’s fate.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.